Attitudes and Expectations of Stakeholders Towards the Intentions to Sustainable Tourism in Krakow after the COVID-19 Pandemic

Zygmunt Kruczek, Adam Szromek, Bartłomiej Walas, Leszek Mazanek

Abstract


Cities, especially those with historical values, are the target of mass tourism. Urban space is often the main source of disputes arising from conflicting interests, attitudes, and needs relating to the way it is used. The causes of conflicts and their scale vary widely. The aim of the research described in the article was to identify the attitudes and expectations of the inhabitants that contribute to the sustainability of the city’s tourism economy. The scope of the research also included the analysis of the intensity of conflicts between residents and tourists and the tourism sector. The research was conducted in July 2020, i.e. during the COVID-19 pandemic, using a questionnaire with an extensive structure. Statistical analysis of the obtained data included surveys obtained from 386 respondents and the division into persons representing the tourism industry (45% of respondents), as well as differentiation by place of residence, in order to distinguish districts with high tourist traffic. The conflicts occurring among the stakeholders of the tourism market were analyzed, who were classified into four groups: entrepreneurs from the tourism industry, residents of Krakow, tourists from the reception area and local government. The level of conflicts was tested using a rating scale that was calibrated against zero (0.0 ± 1.0). The respondents most often indicated the occurrence of conflicts between tourists and residents, and between representatives of the tourism industry and residents. A conflict between the inhabitants and the local government is noticed a little less frequently. The conflict between the tourists themselves is strongly denied. In the opinion of the respondents, conflicts are the result of different structures in the hierarchy of values and the different perception of the city. The common postulate of sustainable tourism in cities after the pandemic period has been identified in the research through the attitudes and expectations of residents. They mainly concern limiting the number of new accommodation facilities in historical zone, limiting short-term tourist rentals and the right of the city authorities to interfere with the rental phenomenon, increasing restrictions on entering the city center, prohibiting onerous types of transport, and restricting hours of serving alcohol.


Keywords


historical cities; tourism; stakeholders; conflicts; sustainable tourism; COVID-19

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


LITERATURA

Atkinson R., Bridge G. 2005. Gentrification in a Global Context. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392089

Colomb C., Novy J. (eds.). 2017. Protest and Resistance in the Tourist City. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719306

Dmochowska-Dudek K. 2013. Syndrom NIMBY w przestrzeni miejskiej. Przykład Łodzi. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://doi.org/10.18778/7525-897-4

Dziedzic E. 2010. Konflikty jako czynnik kształtujący produkty turystyki miejskiej (na przykładzie Warszawy). W: J. Sala (red.), Konkurencyjność miast i regionów na globalnym rynku turystycznym (s. 577–593). Warszawa: PWE.

European Cities Marketing. 2018. Managing Tourism Growth in Europe. The ECM toolbox, Toposophy, Dijon.

European Commission. 2016. The European Tourism Indicator System: ETIS Toolkit for sustainable destination management.

Fedyk W., Sołtysik M., Olearnik J., Barwicka K., Mucha A. 2020. How Overtourism Threatens Large Urban Areas: A Case Study of the City of Wrocław, Poland. Sustainability 12(5), 1783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051783

Gerritsma R., Vork J. 2017. Amsterdam residents and their attitude towards tourists and tourism. Coactivity: Philosophy, Communication 25, 85–98. https://doi.org/10.3846/cpc.2017.274

González D.A., Fosse J., Santos Lacueva R. 2018. The Integration of Sustainability in Tourism Policies of Major European Cities. Barcelona: Eco-union.

Harvey D. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London – New York: Verso.

Hausner J., Karwińska A., Purchla J. 2013. Kultura a rozwój. Warszawa: NCN.

Kowalczyk-Anioł J. 2018. Koncepcja gentryfikacji turystycznej i jej współczesne rozumienie. Prace Geograficzne (154), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.4467/20833113PG.18.009.8965

Kowalczyk-Anioł J. 2019. Hipertrofia turystyki miejskiej – geneza i istota zjawiska. Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście 32(4), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.18778/2543-9421.04.01

Kowalczyk-Anioł J., Włodarczyk B. 2017. Przestrzeń turystyczna przestrzenią konfliktu. Prace i Studia Geograficzne 62(2), 53–72.

Kowalczyk-Anioł J., Zmyślony P. 2017. Turystyka miejska jako źródło protestów społecznych: przykłady Wenecji i Barcelony. Turystyka Kulturowa (2).

Krakowski Rynek Nieruchomości. 2017. Urząd Miasta Krakowa.

Kruczek Z. 2018. Turyści vs. mieszkańcy. Wpływ nadmiernej frekwencji turystów na proces gentryfikacji miast historycznych na przykładzie Krakowa. Turystyka Kulturowa 3, 29–41.

Kruczek Z. 2019. Ways to counteract the negative effects of overtourism at tourist attractions and destinations. Annales UMCS Sectio B 74, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.17951/b.2019.74.0.45-57

Kruczek Z., Mazanek L. 2019. Krakow as a Tourist Metropolitan Area. Impact of Tourism on the Economy of the City. Studia Periegetica 2(26), 25–41.

Kubicki P. 2017. Od miejskiego aktywizmu do miejskich ruchów społecznych. Annales UMCS Sectio K 24(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.17951/k.2017.24.2.173

Madurowicz M. 2017. Ciągłość miasta: Prolegomena. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323527251

Moore W.Ch. 2016. Mediacje. Praktyczne strategie rozwiązywania konfliktów. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.

Niemczyk A. 2016. Rola turystyki w kształtowaniu poziomu zaspokojenia potrzeb mieszkańców. Handel Wewnętrzny 4(369), 183–195.

Pawlusiński R., Zmyślony P. 2018. Gospodarka nocna a oferta kulturowa miast. Turystyka Kulturowa (7), 7–22.

Seweryn R., Berbeka J., Niemczyk A., Borodako K. 2017. Wpływ ekonomiczny turystyki na gospodarkę Krakowa 2016. Kraków: Małopolska Organizacja Turystyczna.

Sharpley R. 2018. Tourism, Tourists and Society. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315210407

Szromek A., Kruczek Z., Walas B. 2020. The Attitude of Tourist Destination Residents towards the Effects of Overtourism – Kraków Case Study. Sustainability 12(1), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010228

Tomczyk J. 2017. Ruchy miejskie: konflikt jako strategia rozwiązywania problemów społecznych miasta. Rozprawy Społeczne 11(2), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.29316/rs.2017.13

UNWTO. 2004. Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations (A Guidebook). Madrid.

UNWTO. 2018. City Tourism Performance Research. Madrid.

UNWTO. 2020. Tourism and COVID-19: Priorities for Tourism Recovery. Madrid.

Walas B. 2019. Turystyczny najem krótkoterminowy w ocenie interesariuszy lokalnych. Biuletyn KPZK PAN Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju Polskiej Akademii Nauk, (275), 49–61.

Walas B. (red.). 2018. Miasta Historyczne 3.0. Mieszkańcy a odwiedzający – w poszukiwaniu jakości i komfortu. Kraków: Urząd Miasta Krakowa.

Walas B. (red.). 2020. Polityka zrównoważonej turystyki Krakowa na lata 2021–2018. Kraków: UMK.

Walas B., Kruczek Z. 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on tourism in Cracow in the eyes of tourism entrepreneurs. Studia Periegetica 2(30), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.3664

Zmyślony P., Kowalczyk-Anioł J. 2019. Urban tourism hypertrophy: Who should deal with it? The case of Krakow (Poland). International Journal of Tourism Cities 5(2), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-07-2018-0051

Zmyślony P., Pilarczyk M. 2020. Identification of overtourism in Poznań through the analysis of social conflicts. Studia Periegetica 2(30), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.3169

Żemła M. 2020. Reasons and Consequences of Overtourism in Contemporary Cities – Knowledge Gaps and Future Research. Sustainability 12(5), 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051729

NETOGRAFIA

Borkowski K. (red.). 2019. Ruch turystyczny w Krakowie w 2019 roku. Infografika. Pobrane z: www.mot.krakow.pl/media/badanie-ruchu-turystycznego/infografika-brt-krakow-2019.pdf

GSTC. www.gstcouncil.org

OECD. 2020. Rebuilding tourism for the future: COVID-19 policy response and recovery. Pobrane z: www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/rebuilding-tourism-for-the-future-covid-19-policy-responses-and-recovery-bced9859

Overtourism? Understanding and Managing Urban Tourism Growth beyond Perceptions: Executive Summary. 2018. UNWTO. Pobrane z: www.e-unwto.org/doi/epdf/10.18111/9789284420070




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/b.2021.76.0.45-69
Date of publication: 2021-05-21 10:41:51
Date of submission: 2020-10-11 15:34:06


Statistics


Total abstract view - 2268
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 1823

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Zygmunt Kruczek, Adam Szromek, Bartłomiej Walas, Leszek Mazanek

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.