Wyślij tekst przez e-mail 
Ochrona wartości i instytucji demokratycznych w erze sztucznej inteligencji. Jak Unia Europejska postrzega cyfrowe i związane ze sztuczną inteligencją wyzwania dla demokracji?
Streszczenie w języku polskim
Technologie cyfrowe i sztuczna inteligencja przekształcają procesy demokratyczne i społeczeństwa na całym świecie. W celu sprostania tym wyzwaniom konieczne jest stworzenie kompleksowych ram politycznych. Niniejszy artykuł analizuje, w jaki sposób agenda Unii Europejskiej dotycząca demokracji, praworządności i wartości europejskich jest zintegrowana z polityką cyfrową, w szczególności z polityką regulującą sztuczną inteligencję. Ponadto, artykuł porównuje to podejście ze stanowiskiem Europejskiego planu działania na rzecz demokracji w zakresie zagadnień cyfrowych. Na podstawie analizy jakościowej Aktu w sprawie sztucznej inteligencji, Europejskiego planu działania na rzecz demokracji oraz dyskursu politycznego dotyczącego Europejskiej Tarczy Demokracji w badaniu zidentyfikowano i porównano podstawowe strategie ramowe stosowane przez UE. Analiza wykazała, że wzajemne oddziaływanie między cyfryzacją, sztuczną inteligencją i demokracją przejawia się w czterech uzupełniających i nakładających się na siebie motywach tematycznych.
Słowa kluczowe
Pełny tekst:
PDF (English)Bibliografia
Adam, M., & Hocquard, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence, democracy and elections (EPRS Briefing No. 751.478). European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/751478/EPRS_BRI(2023)751478_EN.pdf [Accessed: 20.09.2025]
Alnemr, N. (2024). Democratic self-government and the algocratic shortcut: The democratic harms in algorithmic governance of society. Contemporary Political Theory, 23, pp. 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-023-00656-y
Barberá, P. (2020). Social media, echo chambers, and political polarization. In N. Persily & J. A. Tucker (Eds.), Social media and democracy (pp. 34–55). Cambridge University Press.
Barnidge, M. (2017). Exposure to political disagreement in social media versus face-to-face and anonymous online settings. Political Communication, 34(2), pp. 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1235639
Battista, D. (2024). Political communication in the age of artificial intelligence: An overview of deepfakes and their implications. Society Register, 8, pp. 7–24. DOI:10.14746/sr.2024.8.2.01
Battista, D., & Mangone, E. (2025). Technological culture and politics: Artificial intelligence as the new frontier of political communication. Societies, 15(4), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15040075
Blauberger, M., & Sedelmeier, U. (2024). Sanctioning democratic backsliding in the European Union: Transnational salience, negative intergovernmental spillover, and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy, 32(2), pp. 365–391.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2318483
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
Burton, J. (2023). Algorithmic extremism? The securitization of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on radicalism, polarization and political violence. Technology in Society, 75, 102262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102262
Chrysidis, Z., Papadopoulos, S.-I., Papadopoulos, S., & Petrantonakis, P. (2024). Credible, unreliable or leaked?: Evidence verification for enhanced automated fact-checking. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Multimedia AI against Disinformation (pp. 73–81). https://doi.org/10.1145/3643491.3660278
Costa, M. I. (2023). The legal concept of discrimination by association: Where does it fit into the digital era. UNIO–EU Law Journal, 9(1), pp. 16–28. https://doi.org/10.21814/unio.9.1.5206
Dewful, A. & Bouwen, R. (2012). Issue Framing in Conversations for Change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48(2), pp. 168-193.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43 (4), pp. 51–58.
European Commission. (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Democracy Action Plan (COM(2018) 790 final).
eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0790
[Accessed: 22.09.2025]
European Commission. (2020). Communication on the European Democracy Action Plan (COM(2020) 790 final).
eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0790
[Accessed: 22.09.2025]
European Commission. (2020, December 3). European Democracy Action Plan: Making EU democracies stronger [Press release]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/ga/ip_20_2250 [Accessed: 19.09.2025]
European Commission. (2023). Explanatory memorandum to the Communication on Defence of Democracy and Implementation of the
European Democracy Action Plan (COM(2023)630, Annex). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:d0c78e96-99c5-11ee-b164-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF [Accessed: 17.09.2025]
European Commission. (2024). A stronger Europe in the world. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/story-von-der-leyen-commission/stronger-europe-world_en [Accessed: 17.09.2025]
European Parliament. (2024). Promoting democracy and observing elections. europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/166/promoting-democracy-and-observing-elections [Accessed: 18.09.2025]
European Parliament. (2024). Proposal for a decision on setting up a special committee on the European Democracy Shield (B10 0216/2024).
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-10-2024-0216_EN.html [Accessed: 20.09.2025]
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj [Accessed: 19.09.2025]
European People’s Party. (2023, May). Shielding democracy and enhancing electoral resilience: A toolkit for a united democratic front [EPP Papers]. https://www.epp.eu/papers/shielding-democracy-and-enhancing-electoral-resilience [Accessed: 18.09.2025]
Fajgelbaum, P., & Khandelwal, A. (2021). The economic impacts of the US-China trade war (Working Paper 29315). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29315/w29315.pdf [Accessed: 20.09.2025]
Ferretti, F. (2022). A single European data space and data act for the digital single market: On datafication and the viability of a PSD2-like access regime for the platform economy. European Journal of Legal Studies, 14, pp. 173-218 https://dx.doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2022.015
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), pp. 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), pp. 2450–2468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170
Frenkel, S., Hsu, T., & Myers, S. L. (2024, October 29). How Russia, China and Iran are interfering in the presidential election. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/29/technology/election-interference-russia-china-iran.html [Accessed: 07.09.2025]
Gallego, A., & Kurer, T. (2022). Automation, digitalization, and artificial intelligence in the workplace: Implications for political behavior. Annual Review of Political Science, 25, pp. 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-104535
Giovanola, B. (2023). Justice, emotions, socially disruptive technologies. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 26(1), pp. 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.1893255
Giusto, H. (2024). European integration in wartime: The EU’s imperative to preserve and rejuvenate Ukraine’s democracy. FEPS. https://feps-europe.eu/european-integration-in-wartime-the-eus-imperative-to-preserve-and-rejuvenate-ukraines-democracy/ [Accessed: 11.09.2025]
Grogan, J. (2022). *Impact of COVID-19 measures on democracy and fundamental rights* (PE 734.010). European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/734010/IPOL_STU(2022)734010_EN.pdf [Accessed: 20.09.2025]
Groves, L., Peppin, A., Strait, A., & Brennan, J. (2023). Going public: The role of public participation approaches in commercial AI labs. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1162–1173). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.09871
Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A human–machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1), pp. 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858691
Hamuľák, O. (2016). National sovereignty in the European Union: View from the Czech perspective. Springer.
van Hulst, M., Metze, T., Dewulf, A., de Vries, J., van Bommel, S., & van Ostaijen, M. (2025). Discourse, framing and narrative: three ways of doing critical, interpretive policy analysis. Critical Policy Studies, 19(1), pp. 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2326936
Irish, J. (2024, June 3). European election: How EU says Russia is spreading disinformation. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/european-election-how-eu-says-russia-is-spreading-disinformation-2024-06-03/ [Accessed: 30.08.2025]
Jungherr, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and democracy: A conceptual framework. *Social Media + Society, 9*(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231186353
Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the public arena. Communication Theory, 33(2–3), pp. 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad006
Kertysova, K. (2018). Artificial intelligence and disinformation: How AI changes the way disinformation is produced, disseminated, and can be countered. Security and Human Rights, 29, pp. 55–81. DOI:10.1163/18750230-02901005
Lambach, D., & Oppermann, K. (2022). Narratives of digital sovereignty in German political discourse. Governance, 36(3), pp. 693–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12690
Landay, J., & Brunnstrom, D. (2024, September 23). Russia produced most AI content to sway US presidential vote, says US intelligence. Reuters. Russia produced most AI content to sway presidential vote, US intelligence official says | Reuters [Accessed: 22.08.2025]
Leslie, D. (2019). Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector. The Alan Turing Institute. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3240529
Metz, C. (2024, May 30). OpenAI says Russia and China used its A.I. in covert campaigns. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/30/technology/openai-influence-campaigns-report.html [Accessed: 24.08.2025]
Natale, S. (2021). Deceitful media: Artificial intelligence and social life after the Turing Test. Oxford University Press.
Nickerson, D. W., & Rogers, T. (2014). Political campaigns and big data. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), pp. 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.51
Odermatt, J., & Lobina, B. (2023). The Russian war against Ukraine and the law of the European Union. European Papers, pp. 1143–1154. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/708
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Budgeting and public expenditures in OECD countries 2019. OECD Publishing.
Outeda, C. C. (2024). The EU’s AI Act: A framework for collaborative governance. Internet of Things, 101291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101291
Polonski, V. (2017, August 8). How artificial intelligence conquered democracy. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-artificial-intelligence-conquered-democracy-77675 [Accessed: 14.08.2025]
Rek, M. (2024). E-democracy in the EU. In E-governance in the European Union: Strategies, tools, and implementation (pp. 103–115). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Rodilosso, E. (2024). Filter bubbles and the unfeeling: How AI for social media can foster extremism and polarization. Philosophy & Technology, 37, 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00758-4
Rossi, A. (2018). How the Snowden revelations saved the EU General Data Protection Regulation. The International Spectator, 53(4), pp. 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2018.1532705
Rouet, G. (2023). The COVID-19 crisis: An accelerator of digital democracy? In G. Rouet & T. Côme (Eds.), Participatory and digital democracy at the local level (pp. 333–349). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20943-7_22
Scherz, A. (2025). How should the EU respond to democratic backsliding? A normative assessment of expulsion and suspension of voting rights from the perspective of multilateral democracy. Journal of European Public Policy. pp. 1-26 https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2444326
Scharkow, M., Mangold, F., Stier, S., & Breuer, J. (2020). How social network sites and other online intermediaries increase exposure to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(6), 2761–2763. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918279117
Simon, F. M. (2022). Uneasy bedfellows: AI in the news, platform companies and the issue of journalistic autonomy. Digital Journalism, 10(10), pp. 1832–1854. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2063150
Simon, F. M., McBride, K., & Altay, S. (2024, September 3). AI’s impact on elections is being overblown. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/09/03/1103464/ai-impact-elections-overblown/ [Accessed: 15.08.2025]
Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament. (n.d.). Special committee on a European democracy shield. https://www.socialistsanddemocrats.eu/committees/special-committee-european-democracy-shield [Accessed: 16.09.2025]
Sychev, A. (2025, January 23). Russia-linked AI websites aim to dupe German voters, study finds. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-linked-ai-websites-aim-dupe-german-voters-study-finds-2025-01-23/ [Accessed: 24.08.2025]
Theocharis, Y., & Jungherr, A. (2021). Computational social science and the study of political communication. Political Communication, 38(1), pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1833121
United Nations. (2024). Can artificial intelligence (AI) influence elections? https://unric.org/en/can-artificial-intelligence-ai-influence-elections/ [Accessed: 16.08.2025]
UN Women. (2025, February). How AI reinforces gender bias — and what we can do about it. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/interview/2025/02/how-ai-reinforces-gender-bias-and-what-we-can-do-about-it [Accessed: 14.08.2025]
Valle-Cruz, D., Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Criado, J. I. (2019). A review of artificial intelligence in government and its potential from a public policy perspective. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 91–99).
Yan, H., Morrow, G., Yang, K.-C., & Wihbey, J. (2024). The origin of public concerns over AI supercharging misinformation in the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Misinformation Review. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/the-origin-of-public-concerns-over-ai-supercharging-misinformation-in-the-2024-u-s-presidential-election/ [Accessed: 19.08.2025]
Zajmi, X. (2024, March 18). AI-driven Russian disinformation campaign targets German elections. Euractiv. https://www.euractiv.com/news/ai-driven-russian-disinformation-campaign-targets-german-elections/ [Accessed: 21.08.2025]
Zidouemba, M. T. (2025). Governance and artificial intelligence: The use of artificial intelligence in democracy and its impacts on the rights to participation. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00229-5
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/k.2026.33.1.97-110
Data publikacji: 2026-10-30 10:11:29
Data złożenia artykułu: 2026-05-05 15:25:44
Statystyki
Wskaźniki
Odwołania zewnętrzne
- Brak odwołań zewnętrznych
Prawa autorskie (c) 2026 Wiktoria Anna Rozbicka
Powyższa praca jest udostępniana na lcencji Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.