Nicholas Urfe’s Individuation and Existential Development in The Magus by John Fowles
Abstract
This article attempts to establish a connection between Jungian analytical psychology and Albert Camus’s existentialism using the example of The Magus by John Fowles. The novel has already been analysed in the context of these theories separately (Ładuch 2022; Onega 1989). However, little has been said about the similarities between the two concepts and how Fowles’s narrative foregrounds them. Jung’s individuation is a process of acknowledging and exploring the archetypes, i.e., separate elements of the collective unconscious, while Camus’s philosophy deals primarily with the clash between the human urge for knowledge and the silence of the world. The article seeks to demonstrate that it is possible to depict a step-by-step personal development process from the writings of these authors and find similarities between them, especially with regard to their outcomes. Influenced by his experiences on Bourani, the protagonist of The Magus goes through individuation that blend elements of Jung’s and Camus’s visions. The “godgame” prepared for Nicholas by Maurice Conchis could be interpreted as both a realisation of the absurd and an opportunity to deal with archetypes. As a result of the experiment, the protagonist becomes authentic, starts to make an effort to maintain personal relationships, and establishes an individual moral code. Finally, the paper asserts that the process is circular, i.e., never-ending, and requires constant effort, which also corresponds with Jung’s and Camus’s frameworks.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aho, Kevin. 2023. “Existentialism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, eds. Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Accessed December 18, 2023. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/existentialism/.
Aronson, Ronald. 2011. “Albert Camus.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, eds. Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Accessed December 18, 2023. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/camus/.
Camus, Albert. 1954. The Rebel: An Essay on Man in Revolt, trans. Anthony Bower. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
---. 1955. The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays, trans. Justin O’Brien. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
---. 1957. The Fall, trans. Justin O’Brien. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
---. 1960. The Plague, trans. Stuart Gilbert. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Fleming, Richard. 1986. “Remarks on the Ethical Conclusion of Camus’ ‘The Rebel.’” CEA Critic 49 (2/4): 114–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44376990.
Fowles, John, and Carol M. Barnum. 1985. “An Interview With John Fowles.” Modern Fiction Studies 31, no. 1: 187–203. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26281415.
Fowles, John. (1964) 1993. The Aristos. Reprint, London: Picador.
---. (1966) 2004. The Magus. Reprint, London: Vintage Books.
---. (1976) 2004. Foreword to The Magus. Reprint, London: Vintage Books.
Hartsock, Mildred. 1961. “Camus’ ‘The Fall’: Dialogue of One.” Modern Fiction Studies 7(4): 357–64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26277213.
Jacoby, Mario. 2000. “The Growing convergence of contemporary psychoanalysis and Jungian analysis.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues: The International Journal of Relational Perspectives 10(3): 489–503. doi:10.1080/10481881009348560.
Jung, Carl G. (1959) 1969. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, trans. Richard F. Carrington Hull. Reprint, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
---. 1982. Collected Works: Aspects of the Feminine, trans. Richard F. Carrington Hull. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
---. 1990. The Basic Writings of C. G. Jung, trans. Richard F. Carrington Hull. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ladkin, Donna, Chellie Spiller, and Gareth Craze. 2016. “The journey of individuation: A Jungian alternative to the theory and practice of leading authentically.” Leadership 14(4): 415-34. doi:10.1177/1742715016681942.
Ładuch, Edyta. 2022. “Various aspects of freedom in John Fowles novels The Collector and The Magus.” Forum Filologiczne Ateneum 1(10): 317-332. doi:10.36575/2353-2912/1(10)2022.317.
Mellon, Linda F. 1991. “An Archetypal Analysis of Albert Camus’s ‘La Pierre Qui Pousse’: The Quest as Process of Individuation.” The French Review 64(6): 934–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/396087.
Mikics, David, and Robert Zaretsky. 2013. “From Solitude to Solidarity: How Camus Left Nihilism Behind.” The Virginia Quarterly Review 89(2): 201–4. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26446761.
Oleś, Piotr K. (2003) 2009. Wprowadzenie do Psychologii Osobowości. Reprint, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Onega, Susana. 1989. Form and Meaning in the Novels of John Fowles. Michigan: UMI Research Press.
Raper, Julius R. 1988. “John Fowles: The Psychological Complexity of ‘The Magus.’” American Imago 45(1): 61–83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26303958.
Rubenstein, Roberta. 1975. “Myth, Mystery, and Irony: John Fowles’s ‘The Magus.’” Contemporary Literature 16(3): 328–39. doi:10.2307/1207406.
Saunders, Peter, and Patricia Skar. 2001. “Archetypes, complexes and self‐organization.” Journal of Analytical Psychology 46(2): 305-23. doi:10.1111/1465-5922.00238.
Vassilieva, Elena. 2004. “John Fowles and the Gothic Tradition.” Doctoral Dissertation, Kingston University.
Winsworth, Ben. 2010. “Existential Psychodynamics in John Fowles’s The Magus.” In Autonomy and Commitment in Twentieth-Century British Literature, eds. Jean-Michel Ganteau, and Christine Reynier, 181-190. Montpellier: Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée. http://books.openedition.org/pulm/14558?nomobile=1.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/nh.2024.9.76-88
Date of publication: 2024-12-30 19:41:39
Date of submission: 2023-12-28 12:06:40
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Marta Szymczyk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.