Soliloquy as Love and Change: Molly Bloom and Ducks, Newburyport
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine two stream-of-consciousness soliloquies delivered by the heroines of James Joyce’s Ulysses (1922) and Lucy Ellmann’s Ducks, Newburyport (2019) in order to underline the possibility of reidentification and change of one’s mindset by means of language. Firstly, the background for the significance of the two characters is outlined since both are presented as fleshed-out female characters that struggle with the reality of their lives. Then the two heroines are respectively positioned in a discourse outlined by Roland Barthes in his A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments (1978), which identifies solitude as the main obstacle in the act of loving. Thus, in the two soliloquies, elements of Barthes’s discourse, called ‘figures,’ are identified in order to outline and analyze each woman’s situation. Despite their differences, both everywomen prove, each in her own way, that the seeming overthinking about a given situation can lead to personal empowerment through an act of (self-)loving, reconciliation with and acceptance of one’s worries regardless of whether the struggle takes place in Dublin at the beginning of the 20th century or in the 21st-century America. The two women’s escape from the dissatisfying status quo suggests the universality of experience and shows that soliloquy may be deployed as a helpful tool in a moment of crisis in one’s personal life.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barthes, Roland. 1978. A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments, trans. by Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.
Bould, Mark. 2021. The Anthropocene Unconscious: Climate Catastrophe Culture. London and New York: Verso.
Callow, Heather Cook. 1992. “Joyce’s Female Voices in ‘Ulysses’.” The Journal of Narrative Technique 22, (3): 151–163. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30225365.
Conde-Parilla, Maria Angeles. 1996. “James Joyce’s ‘Ulysses’: The Obscene Nature of Molly’s Soliloquy and Two Spanish Translations.” James Joyce Quarterly 33, (2): 211–236. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25473720.
Cox, Sarah. 2019. Goldsmiths, University of London. Accessed November 18, 2024. https://www.gold.ac.uk/news/goldsmiths-prize-2019/.
De Bruyn, Ben. 2023. “Introduction: Beyond the Sacrifice Zone.” Textual Practice 37, (10): 1475–1498. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2023.2264675.
Drong, Leszek. 2019. “Between Innovation and Iteration: Post-Joycean Heteroglossia in Eimear McBride’s A Girl Is a Half-formed Thing.” Studia Litteraria Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 14, (1): 1–8. doi: 10.4467/20843933ST.19.004.10081.
Eagleton, Mary. [1986] 2010. Feminist Literary Theory: A Reader. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ellmann, Lucy. 2019. Ducks, Newburyport. Norwich: Galley Beggar Press.
Ellmann, Mary. 1968. Thinking About Women. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Flynn, Catherine. 2022. The Cambridge Centenary Ulysses: The 1922 Text with Essays and Notes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Han, Byung-Chul. 2017. The Agony of Eros, trans. Erik Butler. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hastings, Patrick. 2022. The Guide to James Joyce’s Ulysses. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Heath, Stephen. 1983. “Barthes on Love.” SubStance 11/12, Vol. 11, no. 4 - Vol. 12, no. 1, Issue 37-38: A Special Issue from the Center for Twentieth Century Studies: 100–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/3684183.
Henke, Suzette A. 1980. “Feminist Perspectives on James Joyce.” The Canadian Journal of Irish Studies 6 (1), Literature, Language and Politics in Ireland: 14–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25512488.
Herring, Phillip F. 1969. “The Bedsteadfastness of Molly Bloom.” Modern Fiction Studies 15, (1) James Joyce Special Number: 49–61. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26279202.
Joyce, James. [1914] 1983. Dubliners. London: Penguin Books.
Joyce, James. [1916] 2000. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. London: Penguin Books.
Joyce, James. [1922] 2011. Ulysses. London: Penguin Books.
Kimball, Jean. 1994. “An Ambiguous Faithlessness: Molly Bloom and the Widow of Ephesus.” James Joyce Quarterly 31, (4): 455–472. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25473586.
Lyman, Stephany. 1983. “Revision and Intention in Joyce’s ‘Penelope’.” James Joyce Quarterly 20 (2): 193–200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25476503.
MacVeagh, Molly. 2023. “All Together Now: Ducks, Newburyport and Climate Anxiety’s Molecular Form.” ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 00.0: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isad015.
Purvis, Dustin. 2023. “Epistemological Insecurity in the Anthropocene.” Doctoral Dissertation, West Virginia University.
Voelker, Joseph C. 1976. “‘Nature It Is’: The Influence of Giordano Bruno on James Joyce’s Molly Bloom.” James Joyce Quarterly 14, (1): 39–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25476026.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/nh.2024.9.171-184
Date of publication: 2024-12-30 19:41:47
Date of submission: 2024-02-26 20:14:22
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mateusz Naporowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.