Patronage in Roman Religious Associations in Italy under the Principate

Przemysław Wojciechowski

Abstract


The relationships between the cultores deorum and their patrons seem to meet all the criteria of the classic definition of Roman patronage put forward by A. Wallace-Hadrill. Firstly, there is no doubt that there was a ‘reciprocal exchange of goods and services’ between the patron and the college. The exchange took place on many levels, and the economic aspect was not necessarily the most important one. Secondly, the exchange was asymmetrical and permanent. In exchange for material and non-material support, colleges bestowed honours on their patrons, which strengthened the social prestige of the latter, at the same time creating a positive image of the colleges themselves. Both sides tried to give their relationship a permanent, formalised, and public character. Traces of these attempts are left not only in the well-documented custom of displaying tabulae patronatus in the collegial seat and the patron’s house. The patron frequently included information about the corporate patronage in his cursus honorum, whereas colleges could honour their patron’s birthday with one of the official corporate celebrations. In this way, the relationships between the patron and the college took on features which clearly differentiated them from acts of euergetism, not to mention regular economic transactions. A wealthy, generous, and most importantly influential patron was not only a desirable symbol of prestige for every corporation, but also a guarantee of the efficient functioning of the organisation that could rely on his or her support not only in its daily activity but also in crisis situations. Religious associations had to reconcile themselves to the homines novi of the local elites. The patron of the cultores Herculis in Interamna Nahars, T. Flavius T.f. Isidorus, who evidently proudly emphasises his promotion to the ordo equester, which was the pinnacle of his municipal career, is an excellent example of this phenomenon. Interestingly, the cultores deorum looking for patrons for their associations clearly tried to find ingenui. Although patrons of religious colleges include some liberti, these are rare cases. Wealthy freedmen are usually benefactors of colleges, but the latter did not attach themselves in a permanent way by means of the institution of patronage. This is understandable considering the fact that one of the main tasks of a patron was to represent the college in its contacts with the local authorities. The servile background of the patron lowered not only the college’s prestige but also its chances of successfully defending its interests. The cultores deorum were certainly aware of the mechanisms operating in the public life of the community in which they lived. An analysis of how the institution of patronage functioned in religious associations reveals evidence that their members not only knew the traditional system of values, but also completely identified themselves with this system.


Keywords


history of the Roman Empire; religious associations; patronage; latin epigraphy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ausbüttel F.M., Untersuchungen zu den Vereinen im Westen des Römischen Reiches, Kallmünz Opf. 1982.

Beard M., Delicate relationships, “The Times Literary Supplement” 1990, 4, 529, Jan. 19–25.

Clemente G., Il patronato nei collegia dell’impero romano, “Studi classici e orientali” 1972, 21.

Cracco Ruggini L., Stato e associazioni professionali nell’ età imperiale romana, in: Akten des VI Internationalen Kongresses für Griechische und Lateinische Epigraphik, München 1972, München 1973.

Diosono F., Collegia. Le associazioni professionali nel mondo romano, Roma 2007.

Eilers C.F., Roman Patrons of Greek Cities, Oxford 2002.

Hemelrijk E.A., Hidden Lives, Public Personae: Women and Civic Life in the Roman West, Oxford 2015.

Hemelrijk E.A., Patronesses and “mothers” of Roman collegia, “Classical Antiquity” 2008, 27.

Liu J., «Collegia centonariorum»: The Guilds of Textile Dealers in the Roman West, Leiden–Boston 2009.

Rohde D., Zwischen Individum und Stadtgemeinde. Die Integration von collegia in Haffenstädten, Mainz 2012.

Saller R.P., Personal Patronage under the Early Empire, Cambridge 1982.

Tran N., Les membres des associations romaines: le rang social des collegiati en Italie et en Gaules, sous le haut-empire, Rome 2006.

Nijf O.M. van, Les élites comme patrons des associations professionelles dans l’orient romain, in: M. Cébeillac-Gervasoni, L. Lamoine (eds), Les élites et leurs facettes. Les élites locales dans le monde hellénistique et romain, Rome–Clermont-Ferrand 2003.

Nijf O.M. van, The Civic World of Professional Associations in the Roman East, Amsterdam 1997.

Verboven K., The Associative Order: Status and Ethos among Roman Businessmen in Late Republic and Early Empire, “Athenaeum” 2007, 95.

Wallace-Hadrill A. (ed.), Patronage in Ancient Society, London 1989.

Wallace-Hadrill A., Roman Arches and Greek Honours, “Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society” 1990, 36.

Wojciechowski P., Czciciele Herkulesa w Rzymie. Studium epigraficzno-antroponomastyczne (I–IV w. n.e.), Toruń 2005.

Wojciechowski P., «Cultores deorum». Stowarzyszenia religijne w Italii w okresie wczesnego cesarstwa (I–III w. n.e.), Toruń 2015.

Wojciechowski P., The Imperial Cult in Roman Religious Associations, “Electrum” 2014, 21.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/rh.2017.43.27-40
Date of publication: 2018-02-24 20:38:27
Date of submission: 2017-03-21 11:56:37


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1122
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 749

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.