Reflective Learning as a Response to Contemporary Educational Challenges

Anna Perkowska-Klejman

Abstract


Introduction: Learning and teaching – especially the formal one – usually followed certain patterns that were considered appropriate for the times. Aim: This paper is devoted to reflective learning in the context of contemporary educational challenges. Evidence-based Facts: Reflective learning is based on conscious reflection about one’s knowledge, beliefs, and cognitive processes. Reflectiveness relates to both the person and the learning contexts. It also involves learning about other positions and points of view. Reflective learning considerations are based on constructivism and critical theories. Reflectiveness in education allows for a student to be treated as an active subject of education, who creates and not simply reproduces existing knowledge. Significant consideration is given to the learning context. Reflective learning is also aimed at finding the most efficient solutions for resolving complex problems. Finally, the paper presents challenges in the context of reflectivity in education that are related to the demystification of power mechanisms and the opportunities for emancipation. Summary: The article presents reflexivity as an important attribute of  present-day  education. Reflexivity in education recognize the relationship between the subjective perspective of the subject and the social context , that creates the living space of learners.


Keywords


reflectivity, constructivism, critical theory, educational challenges

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2001). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promote self-development. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Bentley, M., Fleury, S. C., Garrison, J. (2007). Critical constructivism for teaching and learning in a democratic society. Journal of Thought , 42 (3-4), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/jthought.42.3-4.9

Boulter, C.J., Gilbert, J.K. (1995). Argument and science education. W: A. Costello and S. Mitchell (red.). Competing and consensual voices. (s. 84-98). London: Multilingual Matters.

Bourdieu, P. (2005). Dystynkcja. Społeczna krytyka władzy sądzenia. Warszawa: Scholar.

Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. C. (1990). Theory, culture & society. Reproduction in education, society and culture. (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Bridges, E. M., Hallenger, P. (1995). Implementing problem-based learning in leadership development. Eugene, Oregon: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon.

Cotič, M., Zuljan, M. V. (2009). Problem‐based instruction in mathematics and its impact on the cognitive results of the students and on affective‐motivational aspects. Educational Studies, 35 (3): 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648085

Duch, B. J., Groh, S., Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning : a practical "how to" for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline (1st ed.). Sterling, VA: Stylus Pub.

Duffy, T.M., Jonassen, D. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 3–12.

Eisner, E. W. (2003). Questionable assumptions about schooling. Phi Delta Kappan, 84 (9), 648-657.

Fleischer, M. (2010). Wprowadzenie – krótka historia konstruktywizmu. W: B. Balicki. D. Lewiński. B. Ryż. E. Szczerbuk (red.). Radykalny konstrukyuwizm antologia, (s. 7-24). Wrocław: GAJT Wydawnictwo.

Foucault M., (1998). Nadzorować i karać, Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.

Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266-275

Gierak-Onoszko, J. (2019). 27 śmierci Toby'ego Obeda. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Dowody na Istnienie.

Gimenez, T. (1999). Reflective teaching and teacher education contributions from teacher training, Linguagem & Ensino, 2 (2), 129-143.

Glasersfeld, E. (1991). A Constructivist’s View of Learning and Teaching, W: R., Duit, F. Goldberg, H. Niedderer (red.). Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies.

Proceedings of an international workshop. (s. 29-39). Kiel: IPN.

Glasersfeld, E. (2010). Poznanie bez metafizyki: stanowisko radykalnego konstruktywizmu. W: B. Balicki, D. Lewiński, B. Ryż, E. Szczerbuk, (red.) Radykalny konstruktywizm. Antologia, (s. 29-46). Wrocław: GAJT Wydawnictwo.

Goffman, E. (1981). Człowiek w teatrze życia codziennego, Warszawa: PIW.

Habermas, J. (1978). Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests, Londyn: Heinemann.

Hung, W. (2011). Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59 (4), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9198-1

Huxley, A. (2011). Nowy wspaniały świat, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo MUZA S.A.

Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educational Technology, 31(9), 28–33.

Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). Critical Constructivism Primer. New York: P. Lang.

Klus-Stańska, D. (2018). Paradygmaty dydaktyki. Myśleć teorią o praktyce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Kwieciński, Z., (1996). Edukacja wobec wyzwań demokracji. W: H. Kwiatkowska, Z. Kwieciński (red.). Demokracja a oświata kształcenie i wychowanie. Materiały z II Ogólnopolskiego Zjazdu Pedagogicznego. (s. 5-18). Edytor: Toruń.

Lalak, D. (2010). Życie jako biografia. Podejście biograficzne w perspektywie pedagogicznej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Żak.

Larochelle, M. (1999). Radical constructivism at work in education: An Aperçu. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, Special Issue, 6 (1), 5-7. Pobrane 10.04.2021 z: https://cepa.info/3173.

Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.2307/749597.

Melosik, Z. (2016). Technologizacja życia i tożsamości w kulturze współczesnej. Studia Edukacyjne, 38, 43-59. https://doi.org/10.14746/se.2016.38.3.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Moscovici, H., Nichols, S., Habib, G., Tippins, D.J., Sullivan, B. (1994). Reflective ‘tools’ for college teaching and learning. Panel presentation. Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. El Paso, Texas.

Orewll, G., (2013). Rok 1984. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo MUZA S.A

Pamuła, A. (2020). Wrzenie. Francja na krawędzi. Warszawa: Agora.

Perkowska-Klejman, A. (2019). Poszukiwanie refleksyjności w edukacji Studium teoretyczno-empiryczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.

Sajdak, A. (2013). Paradygmaty kształcenia studentów i wspierania rozwoju nauczycieli akademickich. Kraków: Impuls.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass Publishers.

Smith, M. R. (1994). Technological Determinism in American Culture. W: M.R. Smith, L. Marx, (red.). Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. (1-36). London: Cambridge.

Weaver, C.L. Developing reflective judgment: CPE Imperative. Pobrane 3 stycznia 2012 z http://nasje.org/news/newsletter0201/re-sources/skills.htm

Zybertowicz, A. (1995). Przemoc i poznanie. Studium z nie-klasycznej socjologii wiedzy. Toruń: Wydawnictwo UMK.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2021.40.3.7-23
Date of publication: 2021-11-23 10:35:27
Date of submission: 2021-04-18 10:09:30


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1944
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 1252

Indicators





Copyright (c) 2021 Anna Perkowska-Klejman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.