Representing the Woman: The Modern Subject in Quest of Mastery in The Arrow of Gold by Joseph Conrad
Abstract
Conrad’s last novel The Arrow of Gold (1919) not only dramatizes the intricate relationship between the protagonist, Monsieur George, and Doña Rita, but it also brings into focus the modern subject’s endeavour to exert control through the representation and objectification of women, ultimately perpetuating the oppressive discourse of patriarchy. George, a young seaman involved in gun-running for the followers of Don Carlos, the pretender to the Spanish throne, develops desire for Rita. His attitude towards Rita defines him as the subject who seeks to appropriate her by objectifying and transforming her into visual representation. The feminist critique of the modern subjectivity, heir to the Cartesian cogito rooted in the the mind/body dichotomy, points to its significant role in providing the conceptual framework which justifies women’s subservient position. According to Elizabeth Grosz, the mind/body dichotomy, which the narrator relies on to construct Rita’s representation, accounts for the emergence of somatophobia involving the disavowal of the female body as the locus of irrational impulses and, therefore, the source of women’s inferiority. Thus, George’s representation of Rita is marked by the tendency to subordinate the female body to discipline and constraints as well as to desubstantialize her by reducing her to a spectral vision. Although Conrad never declared the intention to speak up for the cause of feminism, yet in The Arrow of Gold he exposes the dichotomous conceptual framework that limits Rita’s autonomy and legitimizes the male subject’s will to mastery.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baines, Jocelyn. 1971. Joseph Conrad. A Critical Biography. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990. Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York, London: Routledge.
Batchelor, John. 1996. The Life of Joseph Conrad. A Critical Biography. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bordo, Susan. 1987. Flight to Objectivity. Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
---. 1993. Unbearable Weight. Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bordo, Susan, and Mario Moussa. 1999. “Rehabilitating the ‘I.’” In Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes, ed. Susan Bordo, 280-304. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Cascardi, Anthony J. 1992. The Subject of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conrad, Joseph. 1947. The Arrow of Gold. Collected Edition. London: Dent.
Erdinast-Vulcan, Daphna. 1991. Joseph Conrad and the Modern Temper. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Flax, Jane. 2004. “Political Philosophy and the Patriarchal Unconscious: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Epistemology and Metaphysics.” In Discovering Reality. Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, ed. Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka, 245-81. New York, Boston, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Geddes, Gary. 1980. Conrad’s Later Novels. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile Bodies. Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Gurko, Leo. 1962. Joseph Conrad. Giant in Exile. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Hampson, Robert. 1992. Joseph Conrad: Betrayal and Identity. London: Macmillan.
---. 1996. “The Late Novels.” In The Cambridge Companion to Joseph Conrad, ed. John H. Stape, 140-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harding, Sandra, and Merrill B. Hintikka. 2004. “Introduction.” In Discovering Reality. Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, ed. Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka, ix-xix. New York, Boston, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Harrington, Ellen Burton. 2017. Conrad’s Sensational Heroines. Gender and Representation in the Late Fiction of Joseph Conrad. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, Susan. 1999. Conrad and Women. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Land, Stephen K. 1984. Conrad and the Paradox of Plot. London: Macmillan.
Lester, John. 2008. “Conrad’s Arrow of Gold.” The Conradian 33 (1):57-68.
Levin, David Michael. 1988. The Opening of Vision. Nihilism and the Postmodern Situation, New York, London: Routledge,
Levin, Yael. 2004. “A Haunting Heroine: The Dictates of an ‘Irrealizable Desire’ in ‘The Arrow of Gold.’” The Conradian 29 (1):127-38.
Meyer, Bernard C. 1967. Joseph Conrad. A Psychoanalytic Biography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Moser, Thomas C. 1957. Joseph Conrad: Achievement and Decline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ortner, Sherry B. 1996. Making Gender: The Politics and Erotics of Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.
Roberts, Andrew. 1992. “The Gaze and the Dummy: Sexual Politics in The Arrow of Gold.” In Joseph Conrad: Critical Assessments, vol. 3, ed. Keith Carabine, 528-50. Mountfield: Helm Information.
Schwarz, Daniel R. 1982. Conrad: The Later Fiction. London: Macmillan.
Warren, Karen J. 1998. “The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism.” In Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, ed. Michael E. Zimmerman, 325-44. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Watts, Cedric. 1993. A Preface to Conrad. London: Longman.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/nh.2024.9.128-140
Date of publication: 2024-12-30 19:41:43
Date of submission: 2024-11-22 18:29:37
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Katarzyna Sokołowska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.