Collaborative Learning with Students - the Relevance of Interpersonal Affordances in the Field of Assessment
Abstract
Introduction: In the introduction I explain the meaning of the main concepts and theoretical categories: a community of practice, the relational concept of learning through knowledge sharing, and social networks. I provide examples of factors that influence the effectiveness of the knowledge sharing process within communities of practice. I add to the analysed concept the category of affordances which is related to the possibilities to act in a specific environment.
Research Aim: The aim of the research is to understand and describe how I create, interpret and change my social and personal environment. I formulate my research perspective in the following questions: How to use possible interpersonal affordances in the field of assessment to build a community of entities learning from each other in the academic space?
Method: It is my choice to work using autoethnography, I apply the procedure of data analysis following the evocative approach, which is characterised by a change in both the subject of cognition (the researcher) and the recipient of the message.
Results: The contemporary context of students’ social functioning requires a decisive transition/return to the culture of relational learning, in which the following are important: taking care of emotional well-being, sensitivity to students’ needs, and support, including in the form of constructive feedback based on individual or group (peer) reflection. These types of values shared in a group provide an environment conducive to learning.
Conclusions: Interpersonal affordances in the field of assessment come from certain types of motivations and values that guide a person building relationships in a specific community. The crisis situation afforded me actions that involved changing my style of everyday functioning to a more attentive, supportive one, requiring the creation of a relational, comfortable space for learning. Communication relationships based on various types of constructive feedback have observably led to a positive change in the contexts of learning from each other.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Język Polski)References
Bergen, C., Bressler, M., Campbell, K. (2014). The sandwich feedback method: Not very tasty. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, Volume 7; Pobrane 3, stycznia, 2023, z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281034931.pdf.
Biesta, G. (2015). Beautiful risk of education. Routledge.
Cardoso, C., Badke-Schaub, P., Eris, O. (2016). Infection moments in design discourse: How questions drive problem framing during idea generation. Design Studies, 46, 59–78. Pobrane 30, stycznia, 2023, z: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.07.002.
Chan, C.K.Y. (2022). Assessment for Experiential Learning (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018391.
Chmielińska, A. (2018). Transgresja twórcza w procesie rozwoju osobistego. Nauki o Wychowaniu. Studia Interdyscyplinarne, 2(7), 221-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2450-4491.07.12
Dotov, D. G., Nie, L., de Wit, M. M. (2012). Understanding affordances: history and contemporary development of Gibson’s central concept. Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 3 (2), 28-39. Pobrane 10, marca, 2023, z: https://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/DDLNMW-Zrozumiec-afordancje.pdf.
Habermas, J. (1999). Teoria działania komunikacyjnego. T. 1. Racjonalność działania a racjonalność społeczna. (Tłum. A. Kaniowski). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Healy, J. P. (2016). The components of the “crit” in art and design education. Irish Journal of Academic Practice, 5(1), Article: 7. https://doi:10.21427/D7RB1V.
Jones, S.H. (2014). Autoetnografia. Polityka tego, co osobiste. (Tłum. K. Podemski). W N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Red.), Metody badań jakościowych. T. 2 (s. 175–218). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Kacperczyk, A. (2014). Autoetnografia – technika, metoda, nowy paradygmat?: o metodologicznym statusie autoetnografii. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 10(3), 32-75. Pobrane 10, lipca, 2022, z: https://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media/files/Przeglad_Socjologii_Jakosciowej/Przeglad_Socjologii_Jakosciowej-r2014-t10-n3-s32-75.pdf.
Kacperczyk, A. (2020). Autoetnograficzna inicjacja. W A. Kacperczyk, M. Kafar (Red.), Autoetnograficzne „zbliżenia” i „oddalenia”. O autoetnografii w Polsce (s. 43-79). Wydawnictwo UŁ; Pobrane 10, lipca, 2022, z: https://www.academia.edu/45513760/Autoetnograficzne_zbli%C5%BCenia_i_oddalenia_O_autoetnografii_w_Polsce_Marcin_Kafar_Anna_Kacperczyk_red_seria_Perspektywy_Biograficzne_t_4_Wydawnictwo_Uniwersytetu_%C5%81%C3%B3dzkiego_%C5%81%C3%B3d%C5%BA_2020_strony_tytu%C5%82owe_spis_tre%C5%9Bci_i_Prolog.
Kozielecki, J. (2001). Psychotransgresjonizm. Wydawnictwo Akademickie Żak.
Krajewski, M. (2013). W kierunku relacyjnej koncepcji uczestnictwa w kulturze. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 1, 29-67. https://doi: 10.2478/kultura-2013-0003.
Lave, J., Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lindberg-Repo, L., Gronroos, Ch. (2004). Conceptualising Strategy from a Relational Perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 229-239. https://doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.10.012.
Longley, A., Moraes, J., Cook, J. (2022). Reaching across from here to there, in precarious times. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning (CriSTaL), 10(SI), 81-108. https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v10iSI.523
Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representations. Explorations in Social Psychology. Cambridge Polity Press.
Patel, Ch. (2018). Situated Learning:Legitimate Peripheral Participation. An Analysis by Charmi Patel. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912281039
Szwed, R. (2011). Reprezentacje opinii publicznej w dyskursie publicznym. Wydawnictwo KUL.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of Practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wenger-Trayner, E., Fenton-O'Creevy, M., Hutchinson, S., Kubiak, Ch., Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. Routledge.
Zbróg, Z. (2019). Wiedza pedagogiczna przyszłych nauczycieli w perspektywie teorii reprezentacji społecznych. Ujęcie dynamiczne. Wydawnictwo APS.
Zgrzebnicki, P. (2020). Autoetnografia jako forma nauki (z komentarzem Marcina Kafara). W A. Kacperczyk, M. Kafar (red.), Autoetnograficzne „zbliżenia” i „oddalenia”. O autoetnografii w Polsce (s. 323-350). Wydawnictwo UŁ.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2023.42.4.41-57
Date of publication: 2024-02-14 11:56:25
Date of submission: 2023-08-08 11:45:15
Statistics
Indicators
Copyright (c) 2024 Zuzanna Zbróg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.